Legal Opinion
Williams v. Winston
Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County
Decided August 18, 1994No. A-9005927PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Norbert A. Nadel, Judge.
This cause came to be heard on intervening Henkel Corporation’s (“Henkel’s”) motion to intervene as a plaintiff pursuant to Civ.R. 24(A)1 and (B)2 and also the right to intervene pursuant to R.C. 4123.93(B)3 and (D),4 which give the right of subrogation to self-insuring employers.
*46According to R.C. 4123.93(B), which was enacted in 1993, the right of subrogation for a self-insured employer in an action involving an injury to a party employee against a third-party tortfeasor is automatic. However, when this case was originally filed in 1990 there was no automatic right of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1937
- Weil v. Taxicabs of Cincinnati, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1942
- Safford v. Metropolitan Life Ins.Ohio Supreme Court · 1928
- State ex rel. Michaels v. MorseOhio Court of Appeals · 1956
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re Hood Ex Rel. State Tobacco LitigationMississippi Supreme Court · 2007
- Dailey v. Dallas Carriers Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1996
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. KidwellOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
- Healthy Mississippi v. State of MississippiMississippi Supreme Court · 2006
- Partnership for a Healthy Mississippi v. State ex rel. BarbourMississippi Supreme Court · 2007