Legal Opinion

Safford v. Metropolitan Life Ins.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 12, 1928No. 21398PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMatthias, J.

The only question argued and submitted in this case is whether the amendment of Section 5433, General Code, passed May 11,1927, whereby the “tax upon the business done” by foreign insurance companies in this state was increased from 2% per cent., as the law theretofore exacted, to 3 per cent., can have application to “the business done” by said companies as disclosed by their respective reports for the calendar year prior to the enactment of the amended statute.

There has been little change in the provisions of the statute involved herein since its enactment in 1904 (97 Ohio Laws, 401). The…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Shwab v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Lewellyn v. FrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. Burgess v. SalmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  4. Ross v. LetticeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
  5. Young v. . Town of HendersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1877

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Van Fossen v. Babcock & Wilcox Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Weil v. Taxicabs of Cincinnati, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Lakengren, Inc. v. KosydarOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Chope v. CollinsOhio Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Smith v. Ohio Valley Ins.Ohio Supreme Court · 1971

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API