Legal Opinion

Applegaeth v. Dean

California Supreme Court

Decided January 29, 1886No. 9969PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Merced County. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Foote, C.

— Action to recover $504.75 paid upon a judgment in excess of the sum declared actually due upon the same as subsequently modified by the court.

A demurrer was filed to the complaint in the action and overruled. Defendant .declining to answer over, judgment passed for the plaintiff, and the former appeals.

It is admitted by the pleadings herein that upon the thirty-first day of December, 1881, the defendant in the present action obtained (in another .suit brought for the foreclosure of a mortgage against the plaintiff, then defendant), in the Superior Court of Merced County, a judgment…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. The BANK OF THE UNITED STATES v. the Bank of WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
  2. Reynolds v. HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  3. Salmon v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ashton v. HeydenfeldtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Consolidated Printing & Publishing Co. v. AllenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Ward v. Board of CommissionersMontana Supreme Court · 1892
  4. L. Christian & Co. v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API