HSBC Mortgage Services, Inc. v. Graikowski
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SCHELLHAS, Judge.
In this mortgage dispute, appellant fee owner argues that (1) the district court erred when it did not adjudge his mortgage void under Minn.Stat. § 507.02 (2010),1 and (2) the facts of the case do not support the application of equitable estop-pel. We conclude that appellant is equitably estopped from challenging the validity of his mortgage, and we affirm.
FACTS
Appellant Thomas Graikowski is the fee owner of certain real property bearing the street address 17431 Auburn Road in Grasston (the property). At all relevant times herein, the property was Graikow-ski’s…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Interstate Power Co. v. Nobles County Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Weitzner v. ThingstadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- Gartner v. EikillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Anderson v. First Nat. Bank of Pine CitySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Dvorak v. MaringSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Brattleboro Savings and Loan Association v. HardieSupreme Court of Vermont · 2014
- Brattleboro Savings and Loan Association v. HardieSupreme Court of Vermont · 2014