Legal Opinion

Gray v. Reeves

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 13, 1977No. Civ. 14783PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

COLOGNE, J.

Stephen Gray filed a complaint against James Reeves, M.D., and McKesson Laboratories alleging negligence occasioned by his use of a drug called prednisone. After Gray’s depositions were taken, Reeves and McKesson moved for summary judgment on the grounds the complaint was barred by the statute of limitations. The motion was denied but was renewed six months later. This second motion was granted and judgment entered in favor of Reeves and McKesson. Gray appeals.

In 1968 Gray began treatment with Reeves who prescribed prednisone to help Gray gain weight and improve his anemic…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. D'AMICO v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Sanchez v. South Hoover HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Huysman v. KirschCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Whitfield v. RothCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  5. R. D. Reeder Lathing Co. v. AllenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Jolly v. Eli Lilly & Co.California Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Sidney-Vinstein v. A.H. Robins Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  3. Leal v. Holy Spirit Ass'n for Unification of World ChristianityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  4. AARTS Productions, Inc. v. Crocker National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  5. Gutierrez v. MofidCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API