Legal Opinion

Tempo Holding Co. v. Oxford City Council

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided April 20, 1992No. CA91-08-135PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Walsh, Judge.

Defendant-appellant, Oxford City Council (“council”), appeals a decision of the Butler County Court of Common Pleas, reversing council’s denial of an additional use permit sought by plaintiff-appellee, Tempo Holding Company (“Tempo”).

The record indicates that on May 13, 1988, Tempo filed an application for an additional use permit with council. 1 Tempo sought to use its property located on West Church Street in Oxford for residential purposes. Though the property was zoned C-3, an Urban Business Commercial District, the Oxford Zoning Code provided that residences are permitted as…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kisil v. City of SanduskyOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Village of Hudson v. Albrecht, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1984
  3. McQueen v. GoldeyOhio Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Budd Co. v. MercerOhio Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Hydraulic Press Brick Co. v. Council of City of IndependenceOhio Court of Appeals · 1984

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Adelman Real Estate Co. v. GabanicOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. Key-Ads v. Board of County Commissioners, Ca2007-06-085 (3-31-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. Hindu Soc. of Greater Cincinnati v. Union Twp. Bd. of Zoning AppealsOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
  4. Midland Steel Products Co. v. International UnionOhio Court of Appeals · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API