Legal Opinion
Carter v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided September 10, 2004No. 04-284CPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CHRISTINE O.C. MILLER, Judge.
This case is before the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to RCFC 12(b)(1). A retired Vietnam-era veteran of the United States Marine Corps seeks redress for an alleged wrongful discharge from active duty based on a faulty medical diagnosis. Argument is deemed unnecessary.
FACTS
When ruling on a facial jurisdictional challenge brought under RCFC 12(b)(1), a court normally accepts as true the unchallenged facts alleged in the complaint. Reynolds v. Army & Air Force Exch. Serv., 846 F.2d 746, 747…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Hughes v. RoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Arbelaez v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Hernandez v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Gant v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
- Stroughter v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Hutchens v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.