Legal Opinion

Gunn v. Automobile Insurance Co. of Hartford

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 15, 2009No. 1345 WDA 2008PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

ALLEN, J.:

¶ 1 Appellant, the Automobile Insurance Company of Hartford, Connecticut (“Appellant”) appeals from the judgment entered in favor of Appellee, Barbara Gunn (“Gunn”) following the trial court’s denial of Appellant’s motion to sever and stay a statutory bad faith claim. The instant matter arises out of a two-count complaint filed by Gunn against Appellant. Gunn’s first count is a breach of contract claim (“UIM claim”) against Appellant, her insurance carrier, for failure to pay underin-surance motorist (UIM) benefits. The second count is a bad faith claim alleging that…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ben v. SchwartzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  2. Mishoe v. Erie InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  3. Jacksonian v. Temple University Health System FoundationSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  4. Boyle v. Erie InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  5. INSURANCE FEDERATION OF PA v. Dept. of Ins.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. K.W. v. S.L.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  2. Red Vision Systems, Inc. v. National Real Estate Information Services, L.P.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  3. Hassett v. DafoeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  4. Pasquini, B. v. Fairmount Behavioral Health SystemSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
  5. In re Reglan/Metoclopramide LitigationSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API