In re Reglan/Metoclopramide Litigation
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
BOWES, J.:
PLIVA, Inc. and Teva Pharmaceutical USA, Inc., (“Generic Defendants”) appeal from the November 18, 2011 order overruling their preliminary objections in the nature of a demurrer to a master complaint filed by Plaintiffs, who are persons allegedly injured after ingesting metoclopram-ide.1 The Generic Defendants assert that all of Plaintiffs’ claims against generic manufacturers of metoclopramide, regardless of the legal theory advanced and without consideration of the applicable state law, are failure-to-warn claims. They continue that all causes of action are…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Johnson v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Thompson Ex Rel. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Sarah Speed v. Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
- Guvenoz v. Target Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2015
- Rehrer v. YoustSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Anand v. Independence Blue CrossDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
- POLT v. SANDOZ, INC.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.