LeBlanc v. Lamar State College
Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HOLLIS HORTON, Justice.
In this appeal, we consider whether the defendants established as a matter of law that they were entitled to summary judgment on the plaintiffs disability-based causes of action. Because we find the tidal court properly granted summary judgment to the defendants, we affirm.
Dana LeBlane sued Lamar State College-Orange and Barbara Peveto, her su pervisor, for unlawful employment practices. LeBlanc claimed that Lamar and Peveto discriminated against her because of her disability and subjected her to a hostile work environment.
LeBlanc raises three issues on appeal.…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Southwestern Electric Power Co. v. GrantTexas Supreme Court · 2002
- Centeq Realty, Inc. v. SieglerTexas Supreme Court · 1995
- MMP, Ltd. v. JonesTexas Supreme Court · 1986
- Diversicare General Partner, Inc. v. RubioTexas Supreme Court · 2005
- Quantum Chemical Corp. v. ToenniesTexas Supreme Court · 2001
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- La China v. Woodlands Operating Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2013
- Texas Department of Family and Protective Services v. Carlotta Howard, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2014
- Texas Department of State Health Services v. Amy W. Rockwood, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2015
- Williamson v. American National Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2010
- in Re State Farm LloydsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.