Legal Opinion

LeBlanc v. Lamar State College

Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)

Decided July 26, 2007No. 09-06-340 CVPublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HOLLIS HORTON, Justice.

In this appeal, we consider whether the defendants established as a matter of law that they were entitled to summary judgment on the plaintiffs disability-based causes of action. Because we find the tidal court properly granted summary judgment to the defendants, we affirm.

Dana LeBlane sued Lamar State College-Orange and Barbara Peveto, her su pervisor, for unlawful employment practices. LeBlanc claimed that Lamar and Peveto discriminated against her because of her disability and subjected her to a hostile work environment.

LeBlanc raises three issues on appeal.…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Southwestern Electric Power Co. v. GrantTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Centeq Realty, Inc. v. SieglerTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  3. MMP, Ltd. v. JonesTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Diversicare General Partner, Inc. v. RubioTexas Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Quantum Chemical Corp. v. ToenniesTexas Supreme Court · 2001

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. La China v. Woodlands Operating Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2013
  2. Texas Department of Family and Protective Services v. Carlotta Howard, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2014
  3. Texas Department of State Health Services v. Amy W. Rockwood, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2015
  4. Williamson v. American National Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2010
  5. in Re State Farm LloydsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API