Legal Opinion

in Re State Farm Lloyds

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 28, 2015No. NUMBERS 13-14-00616-CVPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Memorandum Opinion

Per Curiam 1

Relator, State Farm Lloyds (“State Farm”), filed a petition for writ of mandamus in the above cause through which it contends that the trial court abused its discretion by ordering the production of discovery in native or near-native formats rather than “reasonably usable” formats. 2 Because State Farm failed to meet its burden under the discovery rules to support its objection that it could not produce the discovery through reasonable efforts, we deny relief.

I. . Background

Alejos Ramirez and Ofelia Ramirez, the plaintiffs in the underlying…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. In Re Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  3. In Re Cerberus Capital Management, L.P.Texas Supreme Court · 2005
  4. In Re McAllen Medical Center, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2008
  5. In Re CSX Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 2003

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. in Re State Farm LloydsTexas Supreme Court · 2017
  2. In re Master Flo Valve Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2016
  3. in Re State Farm LloydsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015
  4. In Re EGT Holdings, LLC D/B/A Stephens Roofing & Remodeling and Thomas Patrick Suitt v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2025
  5. in Re K & L Auto Crushers, LLC and Thomas Gothard, Jr.Texas Supreme Court · 2021

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API