Empire State-Idaho Mining & Developing Co. v. Hanley
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern Division of the District of Idaho.
1Opinion of the Court
GILBERT, Circuit Judge.
On November 9, 1903, this court rendered a decree in the above-entitled cause, remanding the same to the court below with directions to modify its final decree in certain respects specified, and directing it to take, if necessary, further proof as to the time when the defendants to the suit, the appellants herein, ceased to exclude the appellee from the mine in question, “and gave or offered to him or his representatives free access thereto and free inspection thereof.” In accordance with that decree, the cause was remanded to the Circuit Court. That court appointed a…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Russell v. FarleySupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Thompson v. Maxwell Land Grant & Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Blossom v. The Milwaukee, &C., Railroad CompanySupreme Court of the United States · 1864
- Beall v. New MexicoSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Sweeney v. HanleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1903
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- American Surety Co. v. BaldwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Baldwin v. AndersonIdaho Supreme Court · 1931
- Dunkley Co. v. Central California CanneriesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1925
- Toledo Scale Co. v. Computing Scale Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1922
- Montana Mining Co. v. St. Louis Min. & Mill. Co. of MontanaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1906
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.