Legal Opinion
Pace v. Shaw
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided February 6, 1929No. 1775. [fn*]PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWalker, J.
We adopt tiie following statement of tlie nature, result, and facts of this case, as made by appellee in bis brief:
“This was a suit instituted by Charles O. Austin, banking commissioner of the state of Texas, against A. V. Pace, appellee, to recover $500, being a 100 per cent, assessment levied against him • as a stockholder in the defunct State Guaranty Bank of Goose Creek, Texas. During the pendency of the suit, James Shaw succeeded Charles O. Austin as banking commissioner, and' substituted himself as plaintiff in said cause.
“Defendant, A. V. Pace, filed an answer* containing a general…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Pool v. ChapmanTexas Commission of Appeals · 1926
- Orndorff v. AustinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
- First State Bank of Montgomery v. First Nat. Bank of NavasotaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912
- Austin v. GambleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
- Seidel v. ShawCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
3Cited by3 opinions
- Pace v. ShawTexas Commission of Appeals · 1930
- Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. LevorsenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1943
- Shaw v. HaileyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932