Legal Opinion

Hall v. Farmers Bank

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided November 5, 1923No. 10,456PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Campbell

The complaint of the plaintiff bank has two causes of action, each on a promissory note, set out in extenso, signed by defendant Hall and one Swanson as makers. The answer to both causes of action is the same. It admits the capacity of plaintiff corporation, its ownership of the notes, their execution by defendant, and denies the other averments of the complaint. Included in the answer are two separate affirmative defenses, and a third separate defense and counterclaim, each of which is based upon the same state of facts. One general statement of the facts relied on to defeat the action thus…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Drescher v. FulhamColorado Court of Appeals · 1898

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Mortgage Guarantee Co. v. ChotinerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Continental Mutual Savings Bank v. ElliottWashington Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Peter v. FinzerNebraska Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Foothills Holding Corp. v. Tulsa Rig, Reel & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1964
  5. New England National Bank v. HubbellIdaho Supreme Court · 1925

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API