Soltero v. Wimer
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*430¶1 — Washington courts have long recognized that community-like1 property jointly owned by partners in a meretricious relationship is subject to a just and equitable distribution when the relationship ends. This distribution resembles in many ways the distribution of community property at the termination of a marriage.
Chambers, J.
¶2 Unlike the distribution in a divorce, however, the separate property of the parties in a dissolving meretricious relationship is not subject to distribution. In this case, after a full trial, the judge below identified no community-like property. Nonetheless, he…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State v. DowningWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. DowningWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- Connell v. FranciscoWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- Nordstrom Credit, Inc. v. Department of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- In Re the Marriage of LindseyWashington Supreme Court · 1984
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- State v. ANJWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. A.N.J.Washington Supreme Court · 2010
- Michaels v. CH2M Hill, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2011
- Michaels v. CH2M Hill, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2011
- Young v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A.Washington Supreme Court · 2020
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.