Legal Opinion

Michaels v. CH2M Hill, Inc.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 26, 2011No. 84168-3PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChambers, J.

¶1 There was a catastrophic failure at the Spokane wastewater treatment plant. One man was killed, two others were severely injured. The survivors successfully sued an engineering firm that was working with the city at the time. We must decide whether that firm enjoys Industrial Insurance Act immunity under RCW 51.24.035. The appellants also challenge the trial judge’s rulings on duty, cause in fact, legal cause, superseding cause, and 26 specific findings of fact. Finding no error, we affirm.

FACTS

¶2 On May 10, 2004, a digester dome at Spokane’s sewage treatment plant collapsed. The collapse…

2Cases cited57 opinions

  1. Hartley v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Cockle v. Dept. of Labor and IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Cockle v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Hertog v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  5. HERTOG, EX REL., SAH v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1999

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Washburn ex rel. Estate of Roznowski v. City of Federal WayWashington Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Michaels v. CH2M Hill, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Leishman v. Ogden Murphy Wallace, PLLCWashington Supreme Court · 2021
  4. B&R Sales, Inc. v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  5. Dewar v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API