Legal Opinion

Nordstrom Credit, Inc. v. Department of Revenue

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 25, 1993No. 59244-6PublishedCited by 61 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDolliver, J.

Appellant Nordstrom Credit, Inc. (Credit) challenges the trial court's ruling that it may not apportion the income at issue among various states for purposes of calculating the Washington business and occupation (B&O) tax. In 1988, the Department of Revenue (DOR) assessed a deficiency of $881,441 against Credit for the years 1984 through 1987. Credit paid the deficiency and brought a refund action under RCW 82.32.180.

Credit was formed to finance the accounts receivable of its parent corporation, Nordstrom, Inc. (Nordstrom). In October 1984, Nordstrom and Credit executed two agreements under…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Armco Inc. v. HardestySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Willener v. SweetingWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Metropolitan Park District of Tacoma v. GriffithWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Rena-Ware Distributors, Inc. v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Grein v. CavanoWashington Supreme Court · 1963

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. In Re DavisWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  2. In re the Personal Restraint of DavisWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Hillis v. Department of EcologyWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Hillis v. State, Dept. of EcologyWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Simpson Inv. Co. v. State, Dept. of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 2000

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API