Beitel v. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Compensation Division
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MACY, Justice.
Appellant Gary Beitel (the employee) applied for worker’s compensation benefits, and the hearing examiner denied his claim. The employee petitioned the district court for a review of the hearing examiner’s decision, and that court affirmed. The employee then perfected his appeal to the Wyoming Supreme Court.
We affirm.
ISSUES
The employee presents the following issues for our review:
1. Did the Hearing Examiner err when he found that Mr. Beitel was required to notify his employer and the Division about his back condition on the date of occurrence and not the day of diagnosis?
2. If…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Rasmussen v. BakerWyoming Supreme Court · 1897
- Matter of Adoption of VossWyoming Supreme Court · 1976
- State Department of Revenue & Taxation v. PacificorpWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
- Pederson v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Workers' Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 1997
- Everheart v. S & L IndustrialWyoming Supreme Court · 1998
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Worker's Compensation Claim of Newman v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Workers' Safety & Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
- Wesaw v. Quality MaintenanceWyoming Supreme Court · 2001
- Horse Creek Conservation District v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Attorney GeneralWyoming Supreme Court · 2009
- State Ex Rel. Wyoming Workers' Safety & Compensation Division v. GarlWyoming Supreme Court · 2001
- Horn-Dalton v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2009
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.