Legal Opinion

Horn-Dalton v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided February 5, 2009No. S-07-0276PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VOIGT, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1] Appellant, Kathleen Horn-Dalton, claims that the district court erred when it upheld an Office of Administrative Hearings' (OAH) decision in favor of the Workers Safety and Compensation Division (Division), which determined that Appellant was not eligible for benefits. The district court upheld the OAH's dismissal of Appellant's claim because it found that Appellant did not timely file her claim and that Appellant was not eligible for benefits because she did not prove that her iliness was work related. We affirm.

ISSUES

[¶ 2] 1. Was the OAH's finding that Appellant's…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Worker's Compensation Claim of Dale v. S & S Builders, LLCWyoming Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Wesaw v. Quality MaintenanceWyoming Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Hanks v. City of CasperWyoming Supreme Court · 2001
  4. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Workers' Safety & Compensation Division v. GarlWyoming Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Worker's Compensation Claim of Iverson v. Frost ConstructionWyoming Supreme Court · 2003

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Judd v. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Safety & Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Worker's Compensation Claim of Straube v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Workers' Safety & Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Langberg v. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Safety & CompensationWyoming Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Worker'S Compensation Claim of Montoya v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Block v. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Safety & Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 2009

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API