Legal Opinion

Everheart v. S & L Industrial

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided April 24, 1998No. 97-109PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MACY, Justice.

The hearing examiner denied the claim for worker’s compensation benefits which was submitted by Appellant Edward Everheart (the employee). The employee filed a petition with the district court for a review of the hearing examiner’s decision, and the district court certified the ease to the Wyoming Supreme Court pursuant to W.R.A.P. 12.09(b).

We affirm the hearing examiner’s decision.

ISSUES

The employee presents the following issues for our review:

I. Whether the Office of Administrative Hearings acted arbitrarily and capriciously by incorrectly applying the law to the facts of this…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Casper Oil Co. v. EvensonWyoming Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Goddard v. Colonel Bozeman's RestaurantWyoming Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Hepp v. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Latimer v. Rissler & McMurry Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Ward v. YoderWyoming Supreme Court · 1960

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Ekberg v. SharpWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Powder River Coal Co. v. Wyoming State Board of EqualizationWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Department of Revenue v. Union Pacific RailroadWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Department of RevenueWyoming Supreme Court · 2007
  5. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Department of Revenue v. Buggy Bath Unlimited, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2001

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API