Legal Opinion

Johnson v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided March 14, 1980No. 79-287PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEWMAN, Chief Judge:

Appellant was convicted of taking indecent liberties with and enticing a minor child. 1 In a post-trial motion appellant asked for a new trial, alleging he had received ineffective assistance from trial counsel. The trial court denied this motion without a hearing. After a remand from this court on an appeal from that denial, 2 the trial court held a hearing on appellant’s allegations. Subsequently, the trial court again denied the motion for a new trial, holding that any incompetence of trial counsel did not “ ‘[blot] out the essence of a substantial defense’ ” under…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Estelle v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Von Moltke v. GilliesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. FritzSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
  2. Curry v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Godfrey v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Miller v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Asbell v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API