Legal Opinion

State v. Fritz

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided January 14, 1987PublishedCited by 1,054 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

HANDLER, Justice.

Defendant, David Fritz, seeks reversal of his convictions for second-degree aggravated assault and third-degree unlawful possession of a handgun. He asserts that the trial court’s refusal to grant a continuance of the trial prevented his attorney from adequately preparing a defense and, consequently, deprived defendant of constitutionally adequate representation by counsel. The issue posed by defendant’s appeal compels us to re-examine the standards that govern a criminal defendant’s entitlement to the effective representation of…

2Cases cited76 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1,054 opinions

  1. State v. PrecioseSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
  2. State v. CummingsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1999
  3. State v. MarshallSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
  4. State v. HarrisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2004
  5. State v. MarshallSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1991

1,049 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API