Legal Opinion

Asbell v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided September 9, 1981No. 14163, 79-1275PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FERREN, Associate Judge:

A jury convicted appellant, Quinton R. Asbell, of robbery, D.C. Code 1973, § 22-2901, and second-degree burglary, id. § 1801(b).1 After noting an appeal and receiving new appointed counsel, appellant requested, and was denied, a new trial based on a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. Although many issues have been raised on appeal, most coverage in a basic question: whether appellant’s counsel, whom the trial court found grossly incompetent, prejudiced appellant to the extent of denying him the essence of a substantial defense. We conclude that counsel’s gross…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Manson v. BrathwaiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. United States v. LovascoSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Moore v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. State v. FritzSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
  2. Head v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Parks v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Ramsey v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. Carter v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API