Legal Opinion

Tennent v. Stacy

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1955No. 33293PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.

Was defendant Ralph S. Stacy a qualified elector in King county, Washington, for ninety days prior to September 14, 1954, and was he eligible to be elected to the office of county assessor?

Subsequent to the general election of November 2, 1954, the King county canvassing board of election returns certified that defendant Ralph S. Stacy had been duly elected to the office of assessor of King county.

Pursuant to statute (Rem. Rev. Stat., § 5366 et seq. [cf. RCW 29.65.010 et seq.]), M. G. Tennent commenced this action contesting defendant’s election and asking that plaintiff be declared the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. DarcyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  2. Bergevin v. CurtzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  3. State ex rel. Lang v. FurnishMontana Supreme Court · 1913
  4. State Ex Rel. Schur v. PayneNevada Supreme Court · 1937

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Defilipis v. RussellWashington Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Freund v. HastieCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975
  3. State ex rel. Hubbard v. LindsayWashington Supreme Court · 1958
  4. State v. JacobsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1976
  5. Defilipis v. RussellWashington Supreme Court · 1958

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API