Legal Opinion

Bergevin v. Curtz

California Supreme Court

Decided December 1, 1899No. Sac. No. 664PublishedCited by 25 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Alpine County. N. D. Aruot, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

COOPER, C.

Appellant was duly elected to the office of supervisor of supervisor district No. 1 of Alpine county at the November election, 1898. This is a proceeding by respondent, as an elector, contesting the right of appellant to hold said office solely on the ground that at the time of the election he was not eligible thereto. The court below rendered judgment against appellant, declaring that at the time of said election he was ineligible to said office, and by its decree annulled and set aside the election. The defendant has appealed from the judgment, and the case is brought here on the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sanford v. PrenticeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1871
  2. O'Flaherty v. City of BridgeportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1894
  3. Webster v. ByrnesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
  4. Welch v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Galvan v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Communist Party of United States of America v. PeekCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Chesney v. ByramCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  4. People v. DarcyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  5. McMillan v. SiemonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API