Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Hubbard v. Lindsay

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 22, 1958No. 34335PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDonworth, J.

This action was commenced by respondent, in her capacity as a qualified elector and as representative of certain other such persons resident in part of King county fire protection district No. 2, for the purpose of obtaining a peremptory writ of mandate compelling appellants, as commissioners thereof, to pass a resolution providing for the merger of a portion of that district with King county fire protection district No. 23, a district adjacent to the area sought to be merged.

The statutory authority for such a merger, and the initial procedure therefor, is set forth in RCW 52.24.090 as…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Shepard v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  2. State ex rel. Carroll v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Tennent v. StacyWashington Supreme Court · 1955

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dumas v. GagnerWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Dumas v. GagnerWashington Supreme Court · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API