Legal Opinion

Mikkilineni v. Penn National Mutual Casualty Insurance

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided June 9, 2003No. Civil Action No.: 01-2287 (RMU)PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

URBINA, District Judge.

Granting the Defendants’ Motion For an Order Prohibiting the Plaintiff From Filing Additional Complaints; Granting Defendants Penn and Dick-ie’s Motion to Transfer

I. INTRODUCTION

After litigating numerous claims in Pennsylvania, Texas, and the Court of Federal Claims, pro se plaintiff M.R. Mik-kilineni re-filed these claims — and a few new claims — in seven civil actions in this court. The instant action pertains to a contract between the plaintiffs corporation, Talasila, and the United States. This case comes before the court on the defendants’ motion…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Piper Aircraft Co. v. ReynoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. In Re Reverend Clovis Carl Green, JrCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
  3. In Re Thomas D. Powell, in Re Brian BrownCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
  4. Urban v. United NationsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
  5. Air Line Pilots Ass'n v. Eastern Air LinesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1987

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Caldwell v. ObamaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
  2. Marks v. TorresDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
  3. Unitronics (1989) (R"G) Ltd. v. GharbDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
  4. Harbison v. U.S. Senate Committee on Foreign RelationsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
  5. KISSI v. MeadDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API