Legal Opinion
Inforeliance Corporation v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided October 28, 2014No. 14-780 CPublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Post-award bid protest; United States Marine Corps; supplementation of administrative record; extra-record evidence of bad-faith or bias; declaration containing specific allegations of bias; conduct hard to explain absent bias; hard facts sufficient to support discovery.
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
WOLSKI, Judge.
The matter before the Court is plaintiffs “Motion for Limited Discovery and Supplementation of the Administrative Record” (Pl.’s Mot.). Specifically, plaintiff seeks three depositions and the production of documents related to its allegation that the procurement decision challenged in…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Camp v. PittsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Axiom Resource Management, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Murakami v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
- Murakami v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Safeguard Base Operations, LLC v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2021
- Palantir Usg, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Proxtronics Dosimetry, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Torres Advanced Enterprise Solutions, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Starry Associates, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.