Legal Opinion
Starry Associates, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided March 21, 2016No. 16-44CPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Bid Protest; Assertions of Bias; Supplementation of the Administrative Record.
OPINION AND ORDER
ERIC G. BRUGGINK, Judge
Pending in this protest of a Department of Health and Human Services’ decision to cancel a solicitation is plaintiffs motion to supplement the administrative record with four depositions it seeks leave to take. Defendant opposes the motion and asks to supplement the record with two documents of its own. The motion is fully briefed, and oral argument was held telephonically on March 18, 2016. Because plaintiff makes credible allegations that the decision to cancel the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Axiom Resource Management, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Galen Medical Associates, Inc. v. United States, and Deborah Downing Md, PllcCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Am-Pro Protective Agency, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Orion International Technologies v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
- Beta Analytics International, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Palantir Usg, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Starry Associates, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Dolphin Park Tt, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2022
- General Dynamics Information Technology, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2026
- Oracle America, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2019
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.