Legal Opinion

Reliance Life Insurance v. Jaffe

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 13, 1953No. Civ. 19556PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.

David and Gertrude Gandin had two minor daughters, to wit: Leslie S. and Peggy Dee. In contemplation of divorce, the parents by a writing entered into an agreement for a property settlement. By that document they agreed that a life insurance policy in David’s name “is to be maintained by the husband”; the beneficiaries to be Leslie and Peggy Dee, “share and share alike, or to the survivor of them.” Prior to his death David executed a change of beneficiary whereby he directed that the proceeds of the policy be placed in two equal trusts with each daughter a beneficiary and his sister, Rose…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Shoudy v. ShoudyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  2. Mutual Life Insurance of New York v. FranckCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  3. Chilwell v. ChilwellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  4. Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. HenesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  5. Leonard v. AlexanderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Fuchs v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1966
  2. Bowers v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1955
  3. Carpenter v. CarpenterCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
  4. Matter of Estate of LemerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Greenberg v. GreenbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API