Legal Opinion
Greenberg v. Greenberg
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 13, 1968No. Civ. 31868PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKaus, P. J.
This is a judgment roll appeal. The only contention is that the conclusions of law and the judgment entered pursuant thereto, are not supported by the findings of fact. We disagree. The following is a summary of facts: Plaintiff, Caroline, is the first wife, defendant, Clarice, is the widow of Joseph Greenberg who died in 1962. Defend ant Gregg is the child of the marriage between Clarice and Joseph. Joseph and Caroline were divorced on November 6, 1945. Part of the property settlement agreement was a promise by Joseph to Caroline to make her the irrevocable beneficiary of about $36,000 worth…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Jory v. Supreme Council American Legion of HonorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Shoudy v. ShoudyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- Mutual Life Insurance of New York v. FranckCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Waxman v. Citizens Nat. Trust & Sav. Bk. of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Chilwell v. ChilwellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Murphy v. Travelers InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- Sandra Joanne Murphy, Plaintiff-Third Party Defendant-Appellant-Cross v. The Travelers Insurance Company, Defendant-Third Party Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross v. Barbara A. Murphy, Individually and as Parent and Natural Guardian of Minors Lee S. Murphy, Etc., Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- Holt v. HoltTennessee Supreme Court · 1999
- Green v. GreenMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1982
- Estate of Beauregard v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1980
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.