Legal Opinion
Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. Henes
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 3, 1935No. Civ. 9810PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.
Plaintiff filed its complaint in interpleader after conflicting claims had been made upon it by the children of the assured and executors of the assured for the proceeds of two life insurance policies. The trial court entered an interlocutory decree of interpleader and thereafter entered judgment determining the conflicting claims of the defendants in favor of the children of the assured. The executors have appealed from said interlocutory decree of interpleader and from said judgment.
There is no dispute concerning the facts as the cause was tried upon a stipulation of facts submitted by the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Shoudy v. ShoudyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- Fidelity Savings & Loan Ass'n v. RodgersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Kearney v. CastellottiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- Simas v. Conselho SupremoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
3Cited by21 opinions
- Murphy v. Travelers InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- Sandra Joanne Murphy, Plaintiff-Third Party Defendant-Appellant-Cross v. The Travelers Insurance Company, Defendant-Third Party Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross v. Barbara A. Murphy, Individually and as Parent and Natural Guardian of Minors Lee S. Murphy, Etc., Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- Greco v. Oregon Mutual Fire InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Chase v. LeiterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- City of Morgan Hill v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.