State v. Tandecki
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
84 P.3d 1262 (2004)
STATE of Washington, Respondent,
v.
Daniel John TANDECKI, Appellant.
State of Washington, Respondent,
v.
Nicolas Andres Pettitt, Appellant.
Nos. 51415-6-I, 51575-6-I.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.
March 1, 2004.
David B. Koch, Nielsen, Broman & Koch PLLC, Seattle, WA, for Appellant.
Erin E. Ehlert, King Co. Pros. Atty's Office, Seattle, WA, for Respondent.
BAKER, J.
In these appeals we are called upon to determine whether the term "immediately" is an essential element of the crime of attempting to elude a pursuing police vehicle.[1] We conclude that it is not. We further…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. KjorsvikWashington Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. LeachWashington Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. HopperWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. BalisokWashington Supreme Court · 1994
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. TandeckiWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. TandeckiWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- Hoblyn v. JohnsonWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
- Allstate Insurance v. HustonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
- State Of Washington, Resp-cross App v. John Alan Whitaker, App-crossCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018