VAGNEUR v. City of Aspen
Colorado Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge MILLER.
Petitioners, Curtis Vagneur and Jeffrey Evans, appeal the district court’s order concluding that two initiated ordinances they submitted consisted of administrative matters and therefore could not be placed on the ballot for the City of Aspen voters. We affirm.
I. Facts and Proceedings
A. Background
The facts are largely undisputed. Since the 1980s, the City of Aspen has been addressing how to facilitate and expand entry into the city from the west via state Highway 82 (the Entrance to Aspen). After preparing a series of environmental impact statements, the city…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Margolis v. District Court in & for the County of ArapahoeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
- People v. ArroyaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999
- McKee v. City of LouisvilleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1980
- Seattle Building & Construction Trades Council v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1980
- Witcher v. Canon CitySupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Vagneur v. City of AspenSupreme Court of Colorado · 2013