Legal Opinion

VAGNEUR v. City of Aspen

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided October 29, 2009No. 08CA2552PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by Judge MILLER.

Petitioners, Curtis Vagneur and Jeffrey Evans, appeal the district court’s order concluding that two initiated ordinances they submitted consisted of administrative matters and therefore could not be placed on the ballot for the City of Aspen voters. We affirm.

I. Facts and Proceedings

A. Background

The facts are largely undisputed. Since the 1980s, the City of Aspen has been addressing how to facilitate and expand entry into the city from the west via state Highway 82 (the Entrance to Aspen). After preparing a series of environmental impact statements, the city…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Margolis v. District Court in & for the County of ArapahoeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
  2. People v. ArroyaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999
  3. McKee v. City of LouisvilleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1980
  4. Seattle Building & Construction Trades Council v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Witcher v. Canon CitySupreme Court of Colorado · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Vagneur v. City of AspenSupreme Court of Colorado · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API