Legal Opinion

Rodgers v. Crumb

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 30, 1997PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: There is no merit to respondent’s contention that County Court lacked jurisdiction to transfer the RPAPL article 7 proceeding from Cherry Creek Town Court to Dunkirk City Court. Petitioner properly moved in County Court to transfer the proceeding because both Town Court Judges had disqualified themselves from hearing the matter (see, CPLR 325 [g]). Respondent failed to preserve for our review his contentions that County Court should have dismissed the summary proceeding because of the pendency of an action in County Court to determine…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hoffman v. HoffmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
  2. Snyder v. Newcomb Oil Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  3. Lanz v. FeolaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  4. Van Deventer v. FosterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
  5. Woodworth v. DelgrandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sovik v. Healing NetworkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  2. Gorman v. RavesiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  3. Slate v. Fredonia Central School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  4. General Electric Capital Corp. v. Loretto-Utica Residential Health Care FacilityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API