Legal Opinion
Slate v. Fredonia Central School District
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 31, 1998PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Although defendant presented sufficient evidence to entitle it to summary judgment dismissing the complaint, plaintiff raised questions of fact concerning causation, notice and the existence of a dangerous condition on the stair in defendant’s school where plaintiff’s son fell, thereby warranting denial of defendant’s motion (see generally, Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562).
Although slight differences in elevation have been held to be nonactionable (see, Morales v Riverbay Corp., 226 AD2d 271; see also, Julian v Sementelli, 234…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Zuckerman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Guerrieri v. SummaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Morales v. Riverbay Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Julian v. SemenelliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Walker v. HuberAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hutchinson v. Sheridan Hill House Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 2015
- Argenio v. Metropolitan Transportation AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Czochanski v. Tishman Speyer Properties, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Meldrim v. Holiday Meadows, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2024
- The People v. Thomas BarnesNew York Court of Appeals · 2015