Legal Opinion

Amparano v. Asarco

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided June 16, 2004No. 2 CA-CV 2003-0162Published

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF ARIZONA DIVISION TWO BETTY AMPARANO and RAYMOND ) 2 CA-CV 2003-0162 AMPARANO, a married couple, on ) DEPARTMENT A behalf of themselves and all others ) similarly situated, ) OPINION ) Plaintiffs/Appellants/Cross-Appellees, ) ) v. ) ) ASARCO, INC., a New Jersey ) corporation, ) ) Defendant/Appellee/Cross-Appellant. ) ) APPEAL FROM THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PIMA COUNTY Cause No. C20023364 Honorable Michael Alfred, Judge AFFIRMED Siegel, Bellovin & Karnas, P.C. By M. David Karnas Tucson and The Shanker Law Firm, P.L.C. By Howard M. Shanker Tempe and Thomas A. Zlaket,…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Hayes v. Continental InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Alexander v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Kiley v. Jennings, Strouss & SalmonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
  4. Hrudka v. HrudkaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
  5. Massengill v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API