Legal Opinion

State v. Sanchez

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 27, 2010No. 910733365; A138844PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosenblum, J.

Defendant, who was convicted of first- and second-degree rape, successfully petitioned for post-conviction relief and, thereby, obtained a new sentencing trial. Following that trial, the court imposed upward departure sentences. Defendant now appeals, contending in his first assignment of error that the trial court erred in imposing upward departure sentences based on facts “not alleged in an indictment or other accusatory instrument, or otherwise formally pled in open court.” In a second assignment of error, defendant contends that the trial court erred in instructing the jury that it could…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. State v. MoenOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  4. State v. WagnerOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  5. State v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 2006

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. CamCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  2. State v. BadilloCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  3. State v. StewartCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  4. State v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  5. State v. ReinkeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API