Legal Opinion

State v. Jay

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 15, 2012No. CR0901085; A145218PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant was convicted of first-degree robbery with a firearm, first-degree burglary with a firearm, second-degree assault, five counts of first-degree theft, and two counts of theft by receiving. On appeal, defendant argues that the trial court erred in receiving a nonunanimous verdict on his robbery conviction and raises an additional pro se assignment of error regarding double jeopardy. We reject without discussion the nonunanimous jury argument, see State v. Cobb, 224 Or App 594, 596-97, 198 P3d 978 (2008), rev den, 346 Or 364 (2009), as well as the double jeopardy argument.

However,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. CobbCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  2. State v. Valladares-JuarezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  3. State v. HuffmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  4. State v. SaucedaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. Rivera-WaddleLane County Circuit Court, Oregon · 2016
  2. State v. DahlCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  3. State v. ManningCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  4. State v. NewmannMultnomah County Circuit Court, Oregon · 2016
  5. State v. KernCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API