Legal Opinion
Rosenblum v. Family Finance Corp.
New York Supreme Court
Decided December 15, 1942PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNova, J.
In this action, brought in equity, defendant moves to dismiss the complaint for insufficiency.
The action is by a borrower against the defendant finance corporation, licensed as a small-loan lender under article 9 of the Banking Law, to cancel a loan and to recover back all instruments of indebtedness and security given in connection therewith and all moneys paid thereunder. The legal basis for such relief is the claim that the loan was void because of defendant’s failure to comply with section 353 of the Banking Law in that the statement of loan fails to make any mention of the security given…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Equity Service Corp. v. AgullAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
- London Realty Co. v. RiordanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
- Family Finance Corp. v. McNeilageCity of New York Municipal Court · 1942
- Family Finance Corp. v. MiickAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1941
- Domestic Finance Corp. v. Williams, New York County Courts1940
3Cited by8 opinions
- McNish v. General Credit CorporationNebraska Supreme Court · 1957
- De Persia v. Merchants Mutual Casualty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944
- Conrad v. Home & Auto Loan Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- Lookebill v. Mom's Mobile Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1977
- Consumers Credit Corp. of Mississippi v. StanfordMississippi Supreme Court · 1967
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.