Legal Opinion
Weinstein v. County of Los Angeles
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 17, 2015No. B250857PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
JOHNSON, J. —
In February 2012, the County of Los Angeles (County) approved a no-bid contract with Ramsell Public Health Rx, LLC (Ramsell), for pharmacy administrator services to assist the County in implementing provisions of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) (Pub.L. No. 111-148 (Mar. 23, 2010) 124 Stat. 119). After AIDS Healthcare Foundation (AHF) challenged the award of the contract, the trial court invalidated the contract in June 2012. Days later, the County approved another no-bid contract with Ramsell substantially identical to the first contract, but which had…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Estate of GriswoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- Domar Electric, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- Mike Moore's 24-Hour Towing v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Aids Healthcare Foundation v. Los Angeles County Department of Public HealthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- County of Los Angeles v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Lucent Technologies, Inc. v. Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- San Diegans for Open Gov't v. City of San Diego, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- 616 Croft Ave., LLC v. City of West HollywoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Alameda Health System v. Alameda County Employees' Retirement etc.California Court of Appeal · 2024
- Am. Medical Response of Inland Empire v. County of San BernardinoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2026
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.