Legal Opinion
Mike Moore's 24-Hour Towing v. City of San Diego
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 29, 1996No. D024685PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HUFFMAN, Acting P. J.
The City of San Diego (the City) awarded five-year contracts for vehicle towing in nine separate districts. The losing bidders in three of these districts, Mike Moore’s 24-Hour Towing (Moore), Tom Moynahan, and H. M. Sevel, Inc. (sometimes collectively the Moore group), filed protests with the San Diego City Council (City Council), which heard them at a council meeting. (San Diego Mun. Code (SDMC), § 22.0513.) The Moore group protested that the bids of the prevailing bidder in those three districts, San Diego Police Tow Operators, Inc. (SDPTO), should have been…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Western States Petroleum Assn. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Lockard v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Lewin v. St. Joseph Hospital of OrangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Shapell Industries, Inc. v. Governing BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Corona-Norco Unified School District v. City of CoronaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Marshall v. Pasadena Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Transdyn/Cresci JV v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- California School Boards Ass'n v. State Board of EducationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Page v. Miracosta Community College DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Schram Construction, Inc. v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.