Legal Opinion

Ewing v. Richvale Land Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 24, 1918No. Civ. No. 1841PublishedCited by 2 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtChipman, P. J.

This is an appeal by defendant Rich-vale Land Company from a deficiency judgment entered by the clerk of the superior court on the coming in of the commissioner’s return in an action to foreclose a mortgage executed by appellant to' plaintiff.

It is alleged in the complaint in the action: That the defendant company executed and delivered to plaintiff two certain promissory notes each for $4,593; that plaintiff is the owner and holder of said promissory notes, neither of which, nor any part thereof except certain interest on one of said notes, has been paid; that to secure payment of said notes…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Herd v. TuohyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Scamman v. BonslettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Leviston v. SwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
  4. Cormerais v. GenellaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863
  5. Hooper v. McDadeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Edwards v. LangCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  2. Donaldson v. HenryIdaho Supreme Court · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API