Legal Opinion

Overshiner v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1901No. 19,547PublishedCited by 28 opinions

' From the Grant Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHadley, J.

Appellant was convicted of practicing dentistry without a license, or certificate of registration, in violation of the provisions of the act of 1899 approved March 6, 1899 (Acts 1899, p. 479). The section involved is in these words: “§2. A board of examiners consisting of five reputable practicing dentists shall be appointed on or before the, .lqst Tuesday of Jjine, 1899, and biennially thereafter, one by the Governor, one by the state board of health, and three by the Indiana state dental association, said board to'serve for the term of two years from the date of such appointment. When…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  2. Butchers' Benevolent Ass'n v. Crescent City Live-Stock Landing & Slaughter-House Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1873
  3. People ex rel. Le Roy v. HurlbutMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
  4. Commonwealth v. VroomanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894
  5. Hedderich v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1885

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Lanza v. WagnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1962
  2. Richardson v. YoungTennessee Supreme Court · 1909
  3. State ex rel. Milwaukee Medical College v. ChittendenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Isenhour v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Ashmore v. Greater Greenville Sewer Dist.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1947

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API