Legal Opinion

Sterling Savings Bank v. Citadel Development Co.

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided September 10, 2009No. Civil 09-404-ACPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

HAGGERTY, District Judge:

Magistrate Judge Acosta has issued a Findings and Recommendation [39] in this action. The Magistrate Judge recommends granting defendants’ Motion to Strike [19] and defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Claim for Appointment of Receiver [16] and denying plaintiffs Motion to Appoint a Receiver [9]. No objections were filed, and the case was referred to this court.

The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). When no timely objection is filed, the court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Connie A. Nagrampa v. Mailcoups, Inc. The American Arbitration AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  4. Spell v. McDanielCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1987
  5. Bruce A. Campbell v. United States District Court for the Northern District of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. LNV Corp. v. Harrison Family Business, LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2015
  2. Leon v. Fedex Ground Package System, Inc.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2016
  3. Securities & Exchange Commission v. GoldstoneDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2016
  4. U.S. Bank, National Ass'n v. CB Settle Inn Ltd. PartnershipDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 2011
  5. Branch Banking and Trust Company v. McIntyre Land Company, Inc.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 2020

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API