Sterling Savings Bank v. Citadel Development Co.
District Court, D. Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
HAGGERTY, District Judge:
Magistrate Judge Acosta has issued a Findings and Recommendation [39] in this action. The Magistrate Judge recommends granting defendants’ Motion to Strike [19] and defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Claim for Appointment of Receiver [16] and denying plaintiffs Motion to Appoint a Receiver [9]. No objections were filed, and the case was referred to this court.
The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). When no timely objection is filed, the court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Connie A. Nagrampa v. Mailcoups, Inc. The American Arbitration AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Spell v. McDanielCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1987
- Bruce A. Campbell v. United States District Court for the Northern District of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- LNV Corp. v. Harrison Family Business, LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2015
- Leon v. Fedex Ground Package System, Inc.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2016
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. GoldstoneDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2016
- U.S. Bank, National Ass'n v. CB Settle Inn Ltd. PartnershipDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 2011
- Branch Banking and Trust Company v. McIntyre Land Company, Inc.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 2020
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.