Legal Opinion
Marco v. Sachs
New York Supreme Court
Decided July 16, 1951PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBartels, J.
Motion for substitution of an assignee as a nominal party defendant. This is a stockholder’s derivative action based upon alleged wrongs perpetrated on the defendant corporation by the individual defendants as directors. In this case Central States Electric Corporation (hereafter referred to as “ Central States ”), which is the parent and controlling stockholder of the Blue Ridge Corporation (hereafter referred to as “ Blue Ridge ”), filed a petition in 1942 in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia for reorganization under Chapter X of the Bankruptcy Act. (U.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Price v. GurneySupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Titus v. WallickSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Darcy v. Brooklyn & New York Ferry Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1909
- Cole v. Millerton Iron Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Bailey v. BaileyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1943
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Marco v. DullesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1959
- Carruthers v. Jack Waite Mining Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1953
- Marco v. DullesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1959
- Marco v. SachsNew York Supreme Court · 1951
- Marco v. SachsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1956
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.