Legal Opinion
Titus v. Wallick
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided February 27, 1939No. 188PublishedCited by 128 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stone
The question for decision is whether the Supreme Court of Ohio, by denying recovery upon a judgment procured by petitioner against respondent' in the courts of New York, has failed to accord to the New York judgment the full faith and credit which Article IY, § 1 of the Constitution commands.
Petitioner brought the present suit against respondent in the Ohio Court of Common Pleas upon a judgment recovered by petitioner against respondent in the Supreme Court of New York on May 1, 1934. Transcript of the New York judgment for $389,103, duly authenticated in conformity to the Act of Congress, R.…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Tumey v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Huntington v. AttrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Fauntleroy v. LumSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Milwaukee County v. M. E. White Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Adam v. SaengerSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by128 opinions
- Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Williams v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Donald L. Snell v. Cleveland, Inc., and Patricia Faber John Does Jane DoesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Sprint Communications Co. v. APCC Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Angel v. BullingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
123 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.