Marco v. Sachs
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDi Gtovanna, J.
This is a motion by the individual defendants, save one (Louis E. Kilmarx), to grant them leave to serve a supplemental answer and, on the basis of such pleading as submitted, and documentary evidence in support thereof, to further grant the moving defendants summary judgment in the action.
A brief review of the history of the litigation is necessary to an understanding of the legal issues presented.
This is a stockholder’s derivative action. It was commenced in 1936 and involves a claim for $3,000,000, based on asserted wrongful acts of former officers and directors of Blue Bidge Corporation…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Small v. SullivanNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
- Weinert v. KinkelNew York Court of Appeals · 1947
- Holmes v. CampAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919
- Holmes v. . CampNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
- Marco v. SachsNew York Supreme Court · 1951
3Cited by9 opinions
- Center v. Hampton Affiliates, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Gabhart v. GabhartIndiana Supreme Court · 1977
- Platt Corp. v. PlattAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964
- Marco v. DullesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1959
- Albert v. SalzmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.