Legal Opinion

Marco v. Sachs

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 26, 1951PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDi Gtovanna, J.

This is a motion by the individual defendants, save one (Louis E. Kilmarx), to grant them leave to serve a supplemental answer and, on the basis of such pleading as submitted, and documentary evidence in support thereof, to further grant the moving defendants summary judgment in the action.

A brief review of the history of the litigation is necessary to an understanding of the legal issues presented.

This is a stockholder’s derivative action. It was commenced in 1936 and involves a claim for $3,000,000, based on asserted wrongful acts of former officers and directors of Blue Bidge Corporation…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Small v. SullivanNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
  2. Weinert v. KinkelNew York Court of Appeals · 1947
  3. Holmes v. CampAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919
  4. Holmes v. . CampNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
  5. Marco v. SachsNew York Supreme Court · 1951

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Center v. Hampton Affiliates, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. Gabhart v. GabhartIndiana Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Platt Corp. v. PlattAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964
  4. Marco v. DullesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1959
  5. Albert v. SalzmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API