Legal Opinion
BarTex Research, LLC v. FedEx Corp.
District Court, E.D. Texas
Decided April 20, 2009No. 2:07-cv-00385PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
JOHN D. LOVE, United States Magistrate Judge.
Before the Court is a Motion for Stay of Litigation Pending Reexamination of the Asserted Patent filed by Defendants FedEx Corporation, FedEx Express Corporation, FedEx Ground Package System, Inc., and FedEx Kinko’s Office and Print Services, Inc. (collectively “FedEx”). (Doc. No. 68.) FedEx has also filed a Reply in Support, (Doc. No. 71), and Plaintiff BarTex Research, LLC (“BarTex”) has filed a Response in Opposition, (Doc. No. 70). For the reasons stated below, FedEx’s Motion is DENIED.
BACKGROUND
BarTex filed the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Ethicon, Inc. v. Donald J. Quigg, Commissioner of Patents & Trademarks and the United States Patent & Trademark OfficeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Gould v. Control Laser Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Patlex Corporation v. Gerald J. Mossinghoff, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- ACUMED LLC v. Stryker Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Wonderland Nurserygoods Co. v. Thorley Industries, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
- Bilberry v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.District Court, W.D. Texas · 2021
- Mantissa Corporation v. Old Second Bancorp, IncDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2018