Legal Opinion
ACUMED LLC v. Stryker Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided December 30, 2008No. 2008-1124PublishedCited by 84 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LOURIE, Circuit Judge.
Stryker Corporation, Stryker Sales Corporation, Stryker Orthopaedics, and Howmedica Osteonic Corporation (collectively, “Stryker”) appeal from the decision of the United States District Court for the District of Oregon granting Acumed LLC’s motion for a permanent injunction. Acumed LLC v. Stryker Corp., No. 04-CV-513-BR, 2007 WL 4180682, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 86866 (D.Or. Nov. 20, 2u007) (“Injunction Opinion ”). Because we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in granting the motion for a permanent injunction, we affirm.
BACKGROUND
Acumed LLC…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Provenz v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Innogenetics, N v. v. Abbott LaboratoriesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- Acumed LLC v. Stryker CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
- Anchor Wall Systems, Inc. v. Rockwood Retaining Walls, Inc., Gls Industries, Inc., Equipment, Inc., Raymond R. Price, and Gerald P. PriceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Kathy Bliesner v. The Communication Workers of America Verizon Northwest Inc., Fka Gte Northwest IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by84 opinions
- I4i Ltd. Partnership v. Microsoft Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Robert Bosch LLC v. Pylon Manufacturing Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
- Tek Global, S.R.L., Tek Corp. v. Sealant Sys. Int'l, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
- Tex. Advanced Optoelectronic Solutions, Inc. v. Renesas Elecs. Am., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.